George. W Bush

[[USMC]|22nd|Pvt.Delta]

Why does everybody hate the guy?
 

Cause' he sucks! As far as I remember he stormed into Iraq thinking they had nukes or something. Now (when they didn't find any) I'm told he blames it on terrorists! If it wasn't for him invading in the first place, the terrorists wouldn't have been aggrivated. So there, basically 9/11, London Bombings n all others are his fault. Sorry if I offend some people, but facts are facts.

[[USMC]|22nd|Pvt.Delta]

Oh yeah, and one more thing, he's a control freak. George has a lot of friends, and the only friends he has are his nukes, I mean, 350 isn't it? 350 Nukes ready to blast away at any given moment, he could rule the world... Imagine this, the true story as to why britain helped amercia in Iraq:

"Help us in Iraq Tony"

"No"

"Do it or we won't help you in your wars"

"No"

"Do it or we'll stick 50 nukes up your butt"

"I'm currently deploying troops at your command, Sir"


I'm told that was what is was like, Bush making threats and blackmailing england.

[andy]

please edit your message, not make a new post.

[NAW-ubastm]

Invading Iraq was an economic/ strategical decision, made before 911..

Why does every one hate him?
I am not hating him, but he s got the wrong job and HE does not care about USA, he does care for "His" guys (rich bastards, not taking care a s-h-i-t for social/ environment issues). Canceling/ ignoring/ violating international contracts/ agreements.
I guess since HE is president follow happend:
Economy goes down.
War has grown
The image of USA went down quiet strong! (not only in the far east....)

my 2 cents (in one post...) 

[NAW-LawDog]

LOL, Conspiriacy Theorist 

[Mbuna]

i was waiting for lawdog to make his entrance....

bush has more friends than just bombs... american oil tycoons, saudi oil tycoons, lobbyists of all sorts, christian fundamentalists,  the list just goes on and on and on...

[Leupold]

* Yawn *

[NAW-LawDog]

i was waiting for lawdog to make his entrance....

And let yall have all the fun B@#!Hing and complaining.

I wouldnt think of not joining in, in some form to watch yalls blood boil
and see yall implode. 

How about ole Karl Rove?  I know yall are hating that.........

You know how we do! 

[Dukelive]

A movie you may want to see:

"Farenheit 9/11".

Great movie, makes George W. Bush look like a complete baboon, and straightens out alot of stuff that's unanswered.



Also... Did ANYONE notice how strikingly similar George W. Bush looks to the Mad Magazine Mascot? Or how similar he looks to a MONKEY. I'm dead serious, he looks like a monkey!

[[USMC]|22nd|Pvt.Delta]

Inavading Iraq qas a strategic/economical decision amde before 9/11

That's what I'm saying, by invading Iraq he provoked them!

[johnnythepirate]

A movie you may want to see:

"Farenheit 9/11".

Great movie, makes George W. Bush look like a complete baboon, and straightens out alot of stuff that's unanswered.



Also... Did ANYONE notice how strikingly similar George W. Bush looks to the Mad Magazine Mascot? Or how similar he looks to a MONKEY. I'm dead serious, he looks like a monkey!

Actually, that thing doesn't answer much. It makes you question things, and it made me question the point he is trying to make?
Come on, we have had worse presidents
Bill Clinton screwed us over and gave us a bad name.
So what would you do if you were president and your country was attacked? Sit back and do nothing about it?
People who sit back and do nothing are looked upon as cowards in history.

[Mbuna]

well, i might actually attack the people that attacked me, not people that i dont like from a past dispute that have stuff that i want that happen to look like the people who attacked me... 

leaders/countries that invade countries without justification are looked upon as evil in history...

[johnnythepirate]

Well, what about us just taking down this top dog for Bin Laden? Isn't that relevant to the attacks on 9/11?

And here's some interesting facts :


"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
    President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
    President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

source : http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/wmdquotes.asp

As you can see, Bush wasn't the one who started talking of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.
So if youre going to call him nuts and blame him, then you might as well blame Clinton and others.


Just trying to get some heat off of Bush.
I believe personally that the weapons of mass destruction were moved out of Iraq and into other countries.

[Mbuna]

of course you want to take heat off of bush!but unfortunatly he has set the controls for the heart of the sun with his politics... typical conservative argument- when in doubt just say 'clinton' or 'liberal media'...  talk about *yawn*... and the guy that died last week (what impecable timing) had nothing to do with 9/11. i thought he did as well until i read up on him a bit more...

[[PLA]38th|Pvt.WillyD]

Congratulations johnny.  you have successfully expanded the argument from Bush being incompetent to the entire United States government being incompetent.  I couldn't agree with you more.  How can a quasi-democracy function properly when the primary goals are acquiring wealth over the welfare of the people?  The problem isn't our leaders or the voters.  The probelm is capitalism.  As long as the elite classes are defined by wealth and their acquistion of it they will always be the leaders, which in teh end will always lead to policy that benifits those elite classes.  As for Bush, he is simply another product of capitalism and the greed that comes along with it.  ~WillyD